We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
life is life, so don't worry so much. worry lines are unattractive.
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Monday, July 4, 2011
In honor of Independence Day
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Cleopatra
![]() |
Coin depicting a likeness of Cleopatra. |
Monday, June 13, 2011
Shangguan Wan'er
One of the most fascinating figures in Chinese history, Shangguan Wan'er (664-710) was a noted literary figure and politician of the Tang Dynasty, associated with powerful women such as Wu Zetian.
Sunday, June 5, 2011
Tiananmen Square Massacre
Saturday, June 4, 2011
primary sources and research
I was researching today for my history class and my friend asked me what a primary source is. Specifically, her question was “Why can’t any book be a primary source?” So I told her. Firstly, a primary source is defined as “an original fundamental and authoritative document pertaining to an event or subject of inquiry” (Dictionary.com). In other words, it is a reputable source of information that (usually) is from same time period as the subject being researched. A primary source traditionally includes newspaper articles, pictures/photos, memoirs, autobiographies, and now, videos. Anything that is contemporary as well as factually correct counts.
The value in primary sources lies in its ability to provide insight into the topic. A primary source does not filters the information presented. It does not press present-day prejudices and assumptions into that information. By analyzing a primary source, one can also discover the context of whatever their researching taken place in. They will not only glean information they’ve been seeking, but also knowledge of the attitudes toward that topic. As a result, the researcher is unimpeded in his work and can form his or her own conclusion. This is highly critical as otherwise the research will denigrate into nothing more than propaganda.
An example that comes to mind when talking about primary sources is the character assassination of Cleopatra. As we all know, Cleopatra was the queen of Egypt who had affairs with both Mark Antony and Julius Caesar. She suicided after the Battle of Actium and Octavian became the Emperor of Rome, etc. But much of the details we receive about her-the story of how she dissolved pearls in vinegar and drank it-are dubious, if not completely false. Since no primary source about Cleopatra exists, we must rely on her enemy, the Romans. No wonder we can’t get an unbiased story of her life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)